Wednesday, October 8, 2014

LULAC - LULAC Loses Case Against Luevanos, the Editor and the NLLAC

The Editor: LULAC sued the NLLAC, the Editor, Angel Luevano, Argentina Luevano and Jan Tucker in the federal court in San Francisco, California in October 2013.  In September of this year, last month, the federal court issued orders that the cases against the Luevanos, the NLLAC and the Editor be dismissed.  The attorney for  defendants has already filed for attorney's fees in the case and might amount to sums in excess of $30,000.00.  The Luevanos were granted permission to sue LULAC under the California SLAP law for filing frivolous lawsuits.  There could be additional litigation for damages resulting from the frivolous lawsuit.  The attorney for LULAC in California was complaining to the court that the Editor was trying to ruin LULAC's reputation.  The LULAC complaint had 87 allegations where all defendants were thrown into the mix and made 87 allegations against all the defendants without differentiating between who did what, against who, when it was said and what was the damage in each case.  The lawsuit ran over 157 pages long.  NLLAC and the Editor was represented by Ligia Parmenter out of San Rafael, California.  LULAC was represented by the same stupid LULAC attorney who wrote the Luevanos in 2010 to cease and desist regarding LULAC matters, a total pendejo by the name of Xavier R. Baeza from Fremont, California.  In his cease and desist letter to the Luevanos, he threaten the Luevanos that when talking to children in classroom presentations that the Luevanos could not make use of the word LULAC, that they could not put the word ex-LULAC anything next to their names.  Angel Luevano was the State Director of LULAC in 2010 when he was sacked by Rosales and Vera.  Argentina Luevano was the VP for the Farwest when she was sacked from LULAC by Rosa and Luis.  The court decision is 13 pages long.  It is wordy enough and significant enough that it got cited by Leagle a sourcing of important cases that add weight to significant case law:
 
 
Court decisions from the federal district courts are not normally cited for case law sourcing.  Being cited is an honor in legal circles.
 

No comments:

Post a Comment